TY - JOUR ID - 10.1016/j.jes.2021.01.029 TI - Comparison of approaches to quantify SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater using RT-qPCR: Results and implications from a collaborative inter-laboratory study in Canada AU - Alex H.S. Chik AU - Melissa B. Glier AU - Mark Servos AU - Chand S. Mangat AU - Xiao-Li Pang AU - Yuanyuan Qiu AU - Patrick M. D' AU - Aoust AU - Jean-Baptiste Burnet AU - Robert Delatolla AU - Sarah Dorner AU - Qiudi Geng AU - John P. Giesy AU - Robert Mike McKay AU - Michael R. Mulvey AU - Natalie Prystajecky AU - Nivetha Srikanthan AU - Yuwei Xie AU - Bernadette Conant AU - Steve E. Hrudey VL - 33 IS - 9 PB - SP - 218 EP - 229 PY - JF - Journal of Environmental Sciences JA - J. Environ. Sci. UR - http://www.jesc.ac.cn/jesc_en/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=S1001074221000346&flag=1 KW - Canadian SARS-CoV-2 Inter-Laboratory Consortium;COVID-19;Wastewater surveillance;Public health;Quality assurance;Quality control AB - Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater is a promising tool for informing public health decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, approaches for its analysis by use of reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) are still far from standardized globally. To characterize inter- and intra-laboratory variability among results when using various methods deployed across Canada, aliquots from a real wastewater sample were spiked with surrogates of SARS-CoV-2 (gamma-radiation inactivated SARS-CoV-2 and human coronavirus strain 229E [HCoV-229E]) at low and high levels then provided “blind” to eight laboratories. Concentration estimates reported by individual laboratories were consistently within a 1.0-log10 range for aliquots of the same spiked condition. All laboratories distinguished between low- and high-spikes for both surrogates. As expected, greater variability was observed in the results amongst laboratories than within individual laboratories, but SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentration estimates for each spiked condition remained mostly within 1.0-log10 ranges. The no-spike wastewater aliquots provided yielded non-detects or trace levels (<20 gene copies/mL) of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Detections appear linked to methods that included or focused on the solids fraction of the wastewater matrix and might represent in-situ SARS-CoV-2 to the wastewater sample. HCoV-229E RNA was not detected in the no-spike aliquots. Overall, all methods yielded comparable results at the conditions tested. Partitioning behavior of SARS-CoV-2 and spiked surrogates in wastewater should be considered to evaluate method effectiveness. A consistent method and laboratory to explore wastewater SARS-CoV-2 temporal trends for a given system, with appropriate quality control protocols and documented in adequate detail should succeed. ER -